Terratec Cinergy 2400i DT Test (TV/Video Card)


  Select and compare
Terratec Cinergy 2400i DT
Test score: B Above average
The score of B is reached using 4 different tests on the Terratec Cinergy 2400i DT (s).
Average score of all TV and video cards: B.
Product specs: Type: Internal TV / Video Card more info
 
Computer Shopper
Issue 8/2006
12 products on test
5 out of 5 stars
"... If you want two digital tuners, this is a great buy."
Download
PC Advisor
Publication date 4/2006
Single test
without overall score Value for money: 8 out of 10 points
"If you use your PC to watch Freeview, you'll probably find this useful - the Terratec provides a number of functions you'd otherwise have to do without. ..."
 
PC Pro
Issue 5/2006
Single test
"very good" (5 out of 6 stars)
"...this is exactly the product system integrators have been looking for and comes just in time for Intel's Viiv push into smaller form factors."
 
RegHardware
Publication date 2/2006
Single test
70%
"... The picture quality is first rate and TerraTec has beaten its competitors to the PCI Express market, but sadly the remote control and software let the overall package down ..."
Download
Pocket-lint.co.uk
Publication date 2/2006
Single test
8 out of 10 points
"A superbly specced add-on for your PC, bringing 21st Century TV into your computer - if you’re one of the few with a computer that can accommodate it."
Download
Your opinion
   
Your experience and expert knowledge on the TV or video card "Terratec Cinergy 2400i DT" will help others make the right choices...
Please write your opinion on the "Terratec Cinergy 2400i DT" here.

Summary of Terratec Cinergy 2400i DT



Computer Shopper magazine awarded the Terratec Cinergy 2400i DT TV or video card 5 out of 5 stars, this score coming from issue (8/2006).
The TV or video card was tested in 5 magazines and, all in all, was fairly well received.
The best review that the Terratec Cinergy 2400i DT could rack up was "very good" (5 out of 6 stars), which was given by PC Pro magazine in 5/2006. RegHardware online magazine gave the product a score of 70% in issue 2/2006, which was the lowest score it received.