SanDisk Sansa View Test (MP3 Player)


  Select and compare
SanDisk Sansa View
Test score: B Above average
The score of B is reached using 4 different tests on the SanDisk Sansa View (s).
Average score of all MP3 player: B.
Product specs: Storage capacity: 8GB; Storage medium: Flash memory; Battery life: 35h; Battery technology: Lithium Polymer; Type: Personal Media Player (PMP); Recording Options: Dictation Machine; FM radio more info
 
Pocket-lint.co.uk
Publication date 5/2008
Single test 		7 out of 10 points
Physically a lot larger than its rivals the Sansa View packs plenty of storage space. Pocket Lint found that the Sansa View does do well with its stand out screen clarity and its great price.
Download
Personal Computer World
Publication date 1/2008
Single test 		"Very good" (4 out of 5 Stars) Value for money: 5 out of 5 stars
"The Sansa View doesn’t look or perform as well as we’d hoped, but the low price more than makes up for this."
Download
PC Advisor
Publication date 12/2007
Single test 		4 out of 5 stars Value for money: 4 and a half stars out of 5
"Overall, the SanDisk Sansa View is a full-featured device with only a few shortcomings, such as its size and navigation software that could use a bit more depth. However, for many, those shortcomings will be more than offset by its sheer value. ..."
Download
CNET.co.uk
Publication date 11/2007
Single test 		"Very Good" (7,3 out of 10 points)
"If you value features and price over a flashy interface and excellent sound quality, the SanDisk Sansa View digital media player is definitely worth a look. It's easy to use and offers a relatively large screen and a memory expansion option."
Download
Your opinion
   
Your experience and expert knowledge on the MP3 player "SanDisk Sansa View" will help others make the right choices...
Please write your opinion on the "SanDisk Sansa View" here.

Summary of SanDisk Sansa View



The MP3 player was tested in 4 different magazines and came away with mostly good reviews.
The SanDisk Sansa View scored highest in PC Advisor online magazine (12/2007) with an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Pocket-lint.co.uk online magazine (5/2008), gave the product its lowest score; a rating of 7 out of 10 points, which says a lot about its quality.