- Start page
- > Software & Peripherals
- > Monitors
- > Samsung SyncMaster XL20
Samsung SyncMaster XL20 Test (Monitor)
Select and compare
The score of C is reached using 3 different tests on the Samsung SyncMaster XL20 (s).
Average score of all monitors: B.
Average score of all monitors: B.
Product specs:
Type: Flat Panel; Connectivity: DVI; Brightness: 260Cd/m²; Max. Resolution: 1600 x 1200; Aspect Ratio: 4:3; Reaction Time: 8; Widescreen: No
more info
|
||
|---|---|---|
Issue 6/2008 Single test |
The Samsung XL20 has an impressive wide colour gamut performance, a fact which is far more noticeable than the LED backlight. The 20in screen is hardly as wide as one should expect but the two added USB ports are a nice touch. The colour is excellent and makes the XL20 an ideal entry-level monitor for semi-pro photographers and designers. Although MacWorld would seem to suggest you first make sure the cost is worth it.
|
|
Publication date 5/2008 Single test |
Value for money: 5 out of 10 points
Though this LED backlit monitor will probably never find the wide market that LCDs currently enjoy, PC Advisor felt the XL20 to be worth the money for those looking for outstanding colour performance.
|
Download
|
Publication date 9/2007 Single test |
Value for money: 10 out of 10 points
"... I've never seen an LCD display with colours as rich. If you want access to a wide colour gamut display, without paying earth shattering prices, then right now this is your only choice."
|
Download
|
Reviews (3)
|
Your opinion
|
|
|---|---|
Your experience and expert knowledge on the
monitor "Samsung SyncMaster XL20" will help others make the right choices... Please write your opinion on the "Samsung SyncMaster XL20" here.
|
|
Summary of Samsung SyncMaster XL20
The monitor was reviewed by 3 magazines with special attention paid to performance, but its overall score of C betrayed its decidedly average performance.
The best review that the Samsung SyncMaster XL20 could rack up was 9 out of 10 points, which was given by TrustedReviews online magazine in 9/2007. PC Advisor online magazine (5/2008), gave the product its lowest score; a rating of 6 out of 10 points, which says a lot about its quality.
