|
||
|---|---|---|
Publication date 3/2007 Single test |
Value for money: 7 out of 10 points
"... It's incredibly easy to enter a URL, and we're impressed that Samsung has squeezed an HSDPA modem into such a slinky device. Trouble is, we can't see ourselves using this phone for regular web surfing."
|
Download
|
Issue 3/2007 Single test |
"... a neat and small clamshell that fits the hand easily and performs well. As a music phone it delivers decent playback through supplied headphones and has software that makes file transfers a cinch."
|
|
Publication date 1/2007 Single test |
"The Samsung Z560 is another impressive offering ... It can access the Internet at speeds equivalent to some people's home broadband connection and yet doesn't feel particularly bulky compared to previous HSDPA handsets"
|
Download
|
Publication date 12/2006 Single test |
Value for money: 8 out of 10 points
"... while it looks and handles well, this handset is a bit large for my tastes. Even with those negative points, I do find it difficult not to think highly of the Samsung SGH-Z560."
|
Download
|
Publication date 12/2006 Single test |
"Good all-round package for those on the go, but temperamental downloads speeds and small-screen surfing might put some off ..."
|
Download
|
Publication date 12/2006 Single test |
"While the Samsung SGH-Z560 isn't the sexiest phone on the market, nor the smallest, it does offer business users one key winning point over other phones around - the HSDPA connectivity. ..."
|
Download
|
|
Your opinion
|
|
|---|---|
Your experience and expert knowledge on the
mobile phone "Samsung SGH-Z560" will help others make the right choices... Please write your opinion on the "Samsung SGH-Z560" here.
|
|
The mobile phone was tested in 6 different magazines and, all in all, was fairly well received.
Under the microscope, the Samsung SGH-Z560 was able to obtain its best score of "Very Good" (7,9 out of 10 points) in the 1/2007 issue of CNET.co.uk online magazine. RegHardware online magazine (12/2006), gave the product its lowest score; a rating of 75%, which says a lot about its quality.