Samsung SGH-i320 Test (Mobile Phone)


  Select and compare
Samsung SGH-i320
Test score: B Above average
The score of B is reached using 5 different tests on the Samsung SGH-i320 (s).
Average score of all mobile phones: B.
Product specs: Features: MP3 Player, Smartphone, Digital Camera; Megapixel: 1.3 Megapixel; Data Transfer: GPRS, EDGE; Standby time: 140h; Weight: 95g; Other Features: Polyphonic Ringtones, Infrared ... more info
 
What Mobile
Issue 5/2007
Single test 		3 out of 5 stars
"... Although it's a little tricky to use as a mobile, the i320 is a decent business device and will slip into your pocket without a bulge."
 
Pocket-lint.co.uk
Publication date 1/2007
Single test 		8 out of 10 points
"Overall the i320 is a very nice smartphone to use and offers a viable alternative to BlackBerry and the Palm Treo."
Download
PDA Essentials & GPS Advisor
Issue 56/2006
Single test 		8 out of 10 points
"Gorgeous design, but Samsung needs to think more about the keyboard next time."
 
CNET.co.uk
Publication date 11/2006
Single test 		"Excellent" (8,5 out of 10 points)
"If you are fan of thin, sleek, black phones and want a smart phone rather than something that is all style and no substance, the i320 could be well worth a look ..."
Download
TrustedReviews
Publication date 10/2006
Single test 		8 out of 10 points Value for money: 8 out of 10 points
"...The wide screen does Windows Mobile Smarpthone a real favour, much of the additional software is useful, and the second battery system is handy. But the keyboard is something of a let-down."
Download
Your opinion
   
Your experience and expert knowledge on the mobile phone "Samsung SGH-i320" will help others make the right choices...
Please write your opinion on the "Samsung SGH-i320" here.

Summary of Samsung SGH-i320



The mobile phone was reviewed by 5 magazines with special attention paid to performance, convincing the majority of its quality.
Under the microscope, the Samsung SGH-i320 was able to obtain its best score of "Excellent" (8,5 out of 10 points) in the 11/2006 issue of CNET.co.uk online magazine. What Mobile magazine gave the product a score of 3 out of 5 stars in issue 5/2007, which was the lowest score it received.