|
||
|---|---|---|
Issue 74/2008 4 products on test |
"Group Test Winner"
The Samsung F700's 3.2" touch screen interface is large and perfect for watching movies. The slide-out keyboard is more comfortable and intuitive than the virtual keyboard provided. In terms of performance, the Samsung is very quick and with a long battery life it is a strong alternative to the iPhone.
|
|
Issue 71/2008 Single test |
Value for money: 8 out of 10 points
"... the Samsung SGH-F700 is an interesting device. If you need to expand the functionality with third party software, then the proprietary OS will put you off, but other than that there is a lot that's appealing here."
|
|
Publication date 1/2008 Single test |
Value for money: 7 out of 10 points
"It's a shame about the irritations, because Samsung has a phone here with massive potential. Its keyboard is superb, it has HSDPA where the iPhone is limited to GPRS, its touch-screen works well most of the time, and the vibration feedback is a thing of genius. ..."
|
Download
|
Publication date 1/2008 Single test |
"It lacks those last degrees of desirability to give the iPhone a jolly good seeing-to."
|
Download
|
Publication date 12/2007 Single test |
"... The F700 can send MMS messages, shoot videos, connect to an HSDPA network and there's a full Qwerty keypad hidden beneath the slide. But there's simply not enough to make it better than the iPhone ..."
|
Download
|
Publication date 11/2007 Single test |
"On paper the Samsung F700 looks to be a great handset that could really challenge the iPhone in all the stakes. Close up and it's good, but not great. ..."
|
Download
|
|
Your opinion
|
|
|---|---|
Your experience and expert knowledge on the
mobile phone "Samsung SGH-F700" will help others make the right choices... Please write your opinion on the "Samsung SGH-F700" here.
|
|
The smart phone was put to the test in 5 magazines convincing the majority of its quality.
The Samsung SGH-F700 scored highest in CNET.co.uk online magazine (12/2007) with an overall rating of "Very Good" (7,8 out of 10 points). The product received its worst result from PDA Essentials & GPS Advisor magazine (issue 71/2008) with a score of 7 out of 10 points.