|
||
|---|---|---|
Issue 8/2007 6 products on test |
"... the touchy-sweepy buttons for the music player are slow and unintuitive. On the positive side, MP3 playback is very good - perhaps a little congested, but beefy and loud."
|
|
Publication date 7/2007 Single test |
Value for money: 6 out of 6 points
"... After the initial wow factor I found the SGH-F300 a somewhat frustrating handset and on balance would rather stick with separate phone and music player. ..."
|
Download
|
Publication date 6/2007 Single test |
"Every so often a device comes along where its creators haven't really thought about the "why", but just the "because we can" and the Samsung F300 is the epitome of this. ..."
|
Download
|
Issue 7/2007 Single test |
"... Having a dual front might seem like a good idea in theory, but this results in a tiny screen for the phone side, an annoying time-consuming switch between both facets and dramatically reduced battery life. ..."
|
|
Publication date 5/2007 Single test |
"... the oddball design makes it confusing to use. Matters also aren't helped by the phone's sluggish feel and poor battery life. There's little to recommend here."
|
Download
|
|
Your opinion
|
|
|---|---|
Your experience and expert knowledge on the
mobile phone "Samsung SGH-F300 Ultra Music" will help others make the right choices... Please write your opinion on the "Samsung SGH-F300 Ultra Music" here.
|
|
The mobile phone was put to the test in 5 magazines but was found lacking that special something, only managing an average score of C.
The best review that the Samsung SGH-F300 Ultra Music could rack up was "very good" (4 out of 5 stars), which was given by What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision magazine in 8/2007. The product received its worst result from Pocket-lint.co.uk online magazine (issue 6/2007) with a score of 4 out of 10 points.