Samsung Photo Frame SPF-72H Test (Digital Picture Frame)


  Select and compare
Samsung Photo Frame SPF-72H
Test score: B Above average
The score of B is reached using 4 different tests on the Samsung Photo Frame SPF-72H (s).
Average score of all digital picture frames: B.
Product specs: Display Size: 7"; Compatible memory cards: SD, MMC, MS, xD; Internal memory: 128MB; Connectivity: USB; Weight: 550g more info
 
Digital Photo
Issue 5/2008
5 products on test
"Good performance" (4 out of 5 stars) Value for money: 5 out of 5 stars
"Digital Photo magazine appeared highly impressed with the Samsung digital photo frame finding the build quality of the unit itself extremely solid and the screen sharp and bright. Bar a slight problem with stretched images owing to the slightly odd aspect ratio held it back."
 
Computing Made Easy
Issue 124
Single test
8 out of 10 points
"The price point is high compared with some models but you are getting a quality product."
 
PC Advisor
Publication date 12/2007
Single test
3 out of 5 stars Value for money: 3 out of 5 stars
"Relatively inexpensive and with a simple interface, we like the 7in Samsung SPF-72H digital photo frame, not least because it doesn't stretch images. But it's difficult to access buttons, and has an unattractive design."
Download
MacWorld
Issue 12/2007
4 products on test
4 out of 5 stars
"... the interface is very easy to navigate, although the buttons are mounted on the back and it's impossible to find them without turning the frame around. ..."
 
Your opinion
   
Your experience and expert knowledge on the digital picture frame "Samsung Photo Frame SPF-72H" will help others make the right choices...
Please write your opinion on the "Samsung Photo Frame SPF-72H" here.

Summary of Samsung Photo Frame SPF-72H



The digital picture frame was put through its paces in the test labs of 4 magazines and, all in all, was fairly well received.
Under the microscope, the Samsung Photo Frame SPF-72H was able to obtain its best score of 4 out of 5 stars in the 12/2007 issue of MacWorld magazine. PC Advisor online magazine (12/2007), gave the product its lowest score; a rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which says a lot about its quality.