Publication date 5/2008 Single test |
Value for money: 8 out of 10
Like many entry-level digital compacts these days the NV20 scores the most points when it comes to ease-of-use and value. Aside from that it slips by the wayside and according to Think Camera doesn't quite match its brilliance in user-friendliness in other key areas such as performance.
|
Download
|
Publication date 1/2008 Single test |
Value for money: 8 out of 10 points
"... It has a lot going for it in terms of looks and features, so it is a shame it is not that bit better when it comes to the all important business of taking a photo."
|
Download
|
Publication date 12/2007 Single test |
Value for money: 4 out of 5 stars
"Recommended"
"Well-made; offers a good selection of features and is easy to use."
|
Download
|
Issue 12/2007 Single test |
Value for money: 17 out of 20 points
"Recommended"
"A well-designed compact that is tardy in use yet produces good images."
|
|
Publication date 10/2007 Single test |
"It might look good, but in use it's awkward, gimmicky and worst of all the images aren't great."
|
Download
|
|
Your opinion
|
|
|---|---|
Your experience and expert knowledge on the
digital camera "Samsung NV20" will help others make the right choices... Please write your opinion on the "Samsung NV20" here.
|
|
The digital camera was tested in 5 magazines and came away with mostly good reviews.
The best review that the Samsung NV20 could rack up was 86%, which was given by What Digital Camera magazine in 12/2007. The product received its worst result from Pocket-lint.co.uk online magazine (issue 10/2007) with a score of 5 out of 10 points.
The Samsung NV20 was given further plaudits in the shape of; "Recommended" (What Digital Camera 12/2007).