- Start page
- > Software & Peripherals
- > All-in-One Printers
- > Samsung CLX-2160N Colour Laser Multi-function Printer
Samsung CLX-2160N Colour Laser Multi-function Printer Test (All-in-One Printer)
Select and compare
The score of C is reached using 3 different tests on the Samsung CLX-2160N Colour Laser Multi-function Printer (s).
Average score of all printers: B.
Average score of all printers: B.
Product specs:
Type: Multifunction Device; Paper Format: A4; Colour; Dimensions WxDxH: 413 x 353 x 333; Special Functions: Fax, Scanning, Copying; Interface: USB 2.0, Ethernet 10/100BaseTX
more info
|
Computing Made Easy
Issue 124 4 products on test |
"The CLX tries to be all things to all people and fails. However, its price point makes it a tempting proposition if you need an all-in-one solution."
|
|
Issue 12/2007 Single test |
Value for money: 4 out of 6 stars
"Samsung has done a good job of packing so many features into such a small chassis and delivering them at a low price. Print speeds are on the money, although this is marred by average output quality and high printing costs."
|
|
Publication date 6/2007 Single test |
Value for money: 8 out of 10 points
"... it's let down by its print quality, particularly in colour. Since this is the main reason for buying a printing device, we can't really recommend this Samsung MFP ..."
|
Download
|
Reviews (3)
|
Your opinion
|
|
|---|---|
Your experience and expert knowledge on the
printer "Samsung CLX-2160N Colour Laser Multi-function Printer" will help others make the right choices... Please write your opinion on the "Samsung CLX-2160N Colour Laser Multi-function Printer" here.
|
|
Summary of Samsung CLX-2160N Colour Laser Multi-function Printer
The all-in-one printer was put to the test in 3 magazines but was found lacking that special something, only managing an average score of C.
Its highest score of "good" (4 out of 6 stars) came from PC Pro magazine which tested the Samsung CLX-2160N Colour Laser Multi-function Printer in their 12/2007 issue. TrustedReviews online magazine gave the product a score of 6 out of 10 points in issue 6/2007, which was the lowest score it received.
