Reallusion iClone Studio 2 Review (Drawing Software)


Select and compare 
iClone Studio II
Test score: B Above average
The score of B is reached using 4 different tests on the Reallusion iClone Studio 2 (s).
Average score of all CAD software: B.
Product specs: Type: Various, Drawing - / Painting Software
  • Reviews (4)
  • Prices
PC Advisor
Publication date 11/2007
Single test
4 out of 5 stars Value for money: 4 out of 5 stars
"Unlike alternatives such as Poser, iClone lacks a multiple undo feature, and you don’t get the same control over elements. But iClone packs remarkable power and usability for its price."
Go to Test
Computer Shopper
Publication date 9/2007
Single test
2 out of 5 stars
"iClone 2 is a great deal of fun and offers some powerful features, but it's too expensive, has a confusing timeline that often fails to work and doesn't handle multiple characters well. ..."
 
TrustedReviews
Publication date 5/2007
Single test
7 out of 10 points
"... The results are better than you’d expect from a relatively low-cost program, but don’t think you’re going to be creating the next Shrek film on it. ..."
Go to Test
Personal Computer World
Publication date 5/2007
Single test
"Very good" (4 out of 5 Stars) Value for money: 4 out of 5 stars
"An easily navigable route into the complexities of 3D animation, iClone 2 Studio offers powerful character creation tools for the price."
Go to Test
Reviews on CAD software package

We notify you free of charge about new

Reviews for this Product,

Reviews in the Category Design Programmes / CAD.

Your email address:

 

Summary of Reallusion iClone Studio 2



2 out of 5 stars was about all this drawing software could manage when it was reviewed in the (9/2007) issue of Comptuer Shopper.
The drawing software was tested in 4 different magazines but its overall score of C betrayed its decidedly average performance.
Its highest score of 4 out of 5 stars came from PC Advisor online magazine which tested the Reallusion iClone Studio 2 in their 11/2007 issue. Computer Shopper online magazine gave the product a score of 2 out of 5 stars in issue 9/2007, which was the lowest score it received.