Philips Cineos HTS6600 Test (Home Theatre System)


  Select and compare
Philips Cineos HTS6600
Test score: B Above average
The score of B is reached using 4 different tests on the Philips Cineos HTS6600 (s).
Average score of all home theatre systems: B.
Product specs: Audio channels: 2.1; Type: Home Cinema in a Box; Components: DVD Player more info
 
AVReview
Publication date 5/2008
4 products on test
8 out of 10 points
Not only is the HTS6600 easy to use but it also has impressive image quality. AVReview liked the compact design of the HTS6600 but found that this caused too much compromise for its surround performance to really impress.
Download
CNET.co.uk
Publication date 3/2008
Single test
"Very Good" (7,2 out of 10 points)
"Philips' HTS6600 is ideal for anyone who wants a stylish, inconspicuous all-in-one system. You shouldn't expect it to deliver proper surround sound from its limited speakers, though."
Download
TrustedReviews
Publication date 1/2008
Single test
7 out of 10 points Value for money: 7 out of 10 points
"... if you're simply looking to improve upon the sound quality from your TV's speakers, then we reckon this system is just the ticket. Its three-channel sound output is powerful and classy, and from a superficial perspective it's one of the most attractive systems of its type."
Download
What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision
Issue 1/2008
Single test
"average" (3 out of 5 stars)
"It certainly looks the part, but this stylish system lacks the extra class when delivering sound and vision."
 
Your opinion
   
Your experience and expert knowledge on the home theatre system "Philips Cineos HTS6600" will help others make the right choices...
Please write your opinion on the "Philips Cineos HTS6600" here.

Summary of Philips Cineos HTS6600



The home theatre system was tested in 4 different magazines and came away with mostly good reviews.
Its highest score of "Very Good" (7,2 out of 10 points) came from CNET.co.uk online magazine which tested the Philips Cineos HTS6600 in their 3/2008 issue. What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision magazine (1/2008), gave the product its lowest score; a rating of "average" (3 out of 5 stars), which says a lot about its quality.