Motorola MOTO U9 Test (Mobile Phone)


  Select and compare
Motorola MOTO U9
Test score: C Average
The score of C is reached using 4 different tests on the Motorola MOTO U9 (s).
Average score of all mobile phones: B.
Product specs: Features: MP3 Player, Digital Camera; Megapixel: 2.0 Megapixel; Data Transfer: EDGE, GPRS; Standby time: 180h; Other Features: Bluetooth, Polyphonic Ringtones; Message Format: SMS, MMS ...
 
TrustedReviews
Publication date 4/2008
Single test
7 out of 10 points Value for money: 7 out of 10 points
"... the front OLED display is distinctive, the shaping is old-hat but remains attractive, and there is a reasonable array of software on board. Other mid-range mobiles do have better battery life, though ..."
Download
CNET.co.uk
Publication date 3/2008
Single test
"Good" (6,8 out of 10 points)
"If you're looking for a fashionable phone that does the basics then the Motorola U9 is worth investigating. Avoid it if you're looking for something with more functional oomph."
Download
Pocket-lint.co.uk
Publication date 2/2008
Single test
5 out of 10 points
"... It's not forward-thinking enough to break away from the now old and boring Razr design, while as a music- or fashion-focused phone it fails to perform. ..."
Download
RegHardware
Publication date 2/2008
Single test
74%
"Even at the highly competitive budget price level it’s pitched at, there are plenty of models offering fuller feature packages."
Download
Your opinion
write new opinion
parbi1
User

Moto u9


Posted on: 12.05.2008   19:54
Score: A  (Excellent)
I think the moto u9 u9 is amazing, It's not perfect but then no phone is perfect

Respond          write new opinion

Summary of Motorola MOTO U9



The mobile phone was tested in 4 different magazines and while not universally beloved, nevertheless managed an average score of C.
Its highest score of "Good" (6,8 out of 10 points) came from CNET.co.uk online magazine which tested the Motorola MOTO U9 in their 3/2008 issue. Pocket-lint.co.uk online magazine gave the product a score of 5 out of 10 points in issue 2/2008, which was the lowest score it received.