HTC P4350 Test (Windows CE PDAs / Pocket PCs)


  Select and compare
HTC P4350
Test score: C Average
The score of C is reached using 6 different tests on the HTC P4350 (s).
Average score of all pdas: B.
Product specs: Type: Palmtop / Windows PDA / Pocket PC more info
 
Pocket-lint.co.uk
Publication date 4/2007
Single test
8 out of 10 points
"Overall, like the TyTN a good strong performer, but for us we would opt for the TyTN or, although yet to be reviewed the Ameo, but then that's a different proposition all together."
Download
ZDNet
Publication date 3/2007
Single test
"Very Good" (8 out of 10 Points)
"... The HTC P4350's feature set is, for the most part, strong. Certainly if you're looking for a connected handheld with a keyboard and you don't need 3G data speeds, then it's worth considering. ..."
Download
CNET.co.uk
Publication date 3/2007
Single test
"Very Good" (7,8 out of 10 points)
"It has a strong feature set but we wish it ran Windows Mobile 6.0 and had 3G connectivity."
Download
TrustedReviews
Publication date 3/2007
Single test
6 out of 10 points Value for money: 6 out of 10 points
"HTC has made some very impressive Pocket PCs. The P4350 is not one of those, being in most respects average, in others below par. The keyboard is its star attraction but on its own it is not enough ..."
Download
PDA Essentials & GPS Advisor
Issue 58/2007
4 products on test
8 out of 10 points
"The P4350 doesn't look all that special, but it offers a lot at a palatable price."
 
RegHardware
Publication date 2/2007
Single test
50%
"Must try harder..."
Download
Your opinion
   
Your experience and expert knowledge on the pda "HTC P4350" will help others make the right choices...
Please write your opinion on the "HTC P4350" here.

Summary of HTC P4350



The Windows CE PDA or PocketPC was put through its paces in the test labs of 6 magazines but its overall score of C betrayed its decidedly average performance.
The best review that the HTC P4350 could rack up was "Very Good" (7,8 out of 10 points), which was given by CNET.co.uk online magazine in 3/2007. The product received its worst result from RegHardware online magazine (issue 2/2007) with a score of 50%.