|
||
|---|---|---|
| More product reviews | ||
Issue 8/2007 5 products on test |
Value for money: 15 out of 20 points
"Recommended"
"... Overall the C5180 is a competent all rounder, but excels nowhere. If network plugability is a must, it's worth a look."
|
|
Publication date 7/2007 Single test |
Value for money: 4 and a half stars out of 5
"The well-priced HP Photosmart C5180 has much to offer for printing photos and for sharing on a small network. It delivers high-quality glossy photos, but its plain-paper photo prints are not great."
|
Download
|
Issue 3/2007 Single test |
"The C5180 is attractive, easy to install and affordable to run. It's a capable printer, but makes disappointing scans and copies. ..."
|
|
Issue 3/2007 8 products on test |
Value for money: 3 out of 5 stars
"The impressive printer and a lacklustre scanner combine to make an average MFD."
|
|
Issue 3/2007 Single test |
Value for money: 4 out of 6 stars
"An excellent all-in-one, particularly when it comes to photo quality, but it's possible to get more features elsewhere."
|
|
Issue 25/2006 Single test |
"... the HP simply isn't value for money, and won't trouble the competition."
|
|
|
Your opinion
|
|
|---|---|
Your experience and expert knowledge on the
printer "Hewlett-Packard Photosmart C5180" will help others make the right choices... Please write your opinion on the "Hewlett-Packard Photosmart C5180" here.
|
|
Average results from the Hewlett-Packard Photosmart C5180 all-in-one printer meant it only managed 3 out of 5 stars in Computer Shopper's (3/2007) issue.
The all-in-one printer was tested in 7 magazines most of them feeling the product did at least have some merit.
Its highest score of 87% came from What Digital Camera magazine which tested the Hewlett-Packard Photosmart C5180 in their 12/2006 issue. MacUser magazine gave the product a score of 2 out of 5 points in issue 25/2006, which was the lowest score it received.
Another feather in the cap of the Hewlett-Packard Photosmart C5180 is the award; "What Digital Camera Choice" (What Digital Camera 12/2006) and "Recommended" (What Digital Camera 8/2007) .