Publication date 11/2009
Single test
|
8 out of 10 points
Value for money: 8 out of 10 points
"While the 46LE700E delivers some if not all of the expected benefits of direct LED technology at an appealing price, making it another good LED TV, it's a shame that its 100Hz system isn't quite potent enough to overcome the motion blur issue that seems inherent to Sharp's current LED panel design."
|
Go to Test
|
Publication date 11/2009
Single test
|
4 out of 5 stars
"For: Local LED backlighting; Cheap for LED TV; Great pictures.
Against: Motion blur."
|
Go to Test
|
Publication date 10/2009
Single test
|
"excellent" (8,4 out of 10 points)
"Adding 100Hz processing into the mix, Sharp's Aquos LC46LE700E certainly improves on the cheaper Aquos LC40LE600E's already good picture quality, at least as far as standard-definition material is concerned. It's just a shame the improvements aren't more pronounced."
|
Go to Test
|
Issue 12/2009
|
“very good” (75%)
Value for money: “very good”,
“Eco Tip”
“Likes: power saving world champion; light picture with good viewing angle; natural colours. Minus: only global LED dimming.”
|
Go to Test
|
Publication date 10/2009
Single test
|
“excellent” (8.4 out of 10 points)
“What we like: intense colour reproduction; good black levels; plenty of configuration options; fair price for the features. What we don’t like: no Ethernet connection; dark presets; no smooth movement; standard definition picture could be better; weak sound.”
|
Go to Test
|