|
||
|---|---|---|
Publication date 7/2010 Single test |
"Pros: Good price. Decent camera. Strong battery life.
Cons: No Wi-Fi or GPS. Small screen."
|
Go to Test
|
Publication date 6/2010 Single test |
"... it's a phone that flatters to deceive - clad in aluminium-looking plastic, offering smartphone capabilities without a number of the connections we're used to, and struggling to perform in some key areas. These are things we can accept in a budget handset, but this one is tipping the scales at around £150 on average, which makes it a little pricey. ..."
|
Go to Test
|
Publication date 6/2010 Single test |
"... Call quality is good, though we wouldn't have minded some dedicated volume keys on the side of the phone. ... We like this phone. It is solidly built and the features are, for the most part well implemented. The camera is a little disappointing, but the 6700 Slide offers slick Facebooking and basic web browsing within an intuitive interface. It's worth bearing in mind though, that for £150 you could pick up a decent touchscreen phone with many of the same features. Unless you're particualrly averse to touchscreens, check out the Samsung Monte before committing to a purchase."
|
Go to Test
|
Publication date 6/2010 Single test |
"... people who just want to make calls, thank you very much, won't be overwhelmed, while more demanding users will find plenty of stuff to use ... If you want a phone that's simple, reliable and accessible, that won't cost a fortune but doesn't feature the advanced functions of a smartphone, the 6700 Slide is a compact phone that works well and looks good."
|
Go to Test
|
| Write new opinion All opinions |
The mobile phone was put through its paces in the test labs of 4 magazines most of them feeling the product did at least have some merit.
Its highest score of "good" (6,9 out of 10 points) came from CNET.co.uk online magazine which tested the Nokia 6700 slide in their 6/2010 issue. TechRadar UK online magazine gave the product a score of 3 out of 5 stars in issue 6/2010, which was the lowest score it received.