Excellent (A)
9 reviews
12/2012
- Type: Sports Bike
- Cubic Capacity: 999 cc
- Nominal Power: Over 100 kW /~ …
- Number of Cylinders: 4 … more information
- S 1000 RR (136kW) [10],
- S 1000 RR (customised) [10],
- S 1000 RR (customised) [12],
- S 1000 RR ABS (142 kW),
- S 1000 RR ABS (142 kW) [10],
- S 1000 RR ABS (142 kW) [11],
- S 1000 RR ABS (142 kW) [12]
Magazine January 2013 Place 2 out of 6 |
8/10
Product tested: S 1000 RR (customised) [12] Having shed a few pounds has made the S 1000 RR a lot of good, since now it feels almost as light as a supersport bike but without sacrificing any control. Fast Bikes were left feeling quite impressed by the raw power on offer here, although they said it needs to be approached with care due to the high rearsets. It's a shame that it's not all carbon, though. |
|
Magazine August 2012 Place 1 out of 10 |
10/10
Product tested: S 1000 RR ABS (142 kW) [12] Although Fast Bikes were annoyed at the S1000RR's intrusive electronics and high price tag, they had to admit that you do get a lot of bike for your money and that few rivals can stand up to it when it comes to handling and wreaking-havoc-potential. It does so with refinement too, thanks to its superb motor which allows the fun to start at much lower rpms than most competitors. |
|
Magazine May 2012 Place 1 out of 5 |
9/10
Product tested: S 1000 RR ABS (142 kW) [12] The successor to the original S 1000 brings along a cartload of small changes that make it a superb update and one of the best sports bikes you can get your hands on according to Fast Bikes. True, it's not very comfortable, but its superb suspension, new TC and redesigned geometry more than make up for it. Unfortunately, the extras are expensive. |
|
Magazine January 2012 Single test |
9/10
Product tested: S 1000 RR ABS (142 kW) [12] Info: This product was retested here May 2012 by Fast Bikes and received the same final score. |
|
Magazine August 2011 Place 2 out of 10 |
9/10
"Sportbike of the Year - fourth place" Product tested: S 1000 RR ABS (142 kW) [11]It is a pity for BMW that they have produced such a superb bike as the S 1000 RR, and it is still beaten in Fast Bikes' awards, particularly as they thought it was 'utterly brilliant'. The price is a bit high and the electronics are a little jaded, but it is nicely aggressive with a great top-end and a superb chassis. |
|
Magazine June 2011 Place 1 out of 6 |
10/10
Product tested: S 1000 RR ABS (142 kW) [10]
"Plus: Pace, motor, track skills, pure thrills. |
|
Magazine June 2011 Place 1 out of 5 |
9/10
Product tested: S 1000 RR ABS (142 kW) [11] Info: This product was retested here August 2011 by Fast Bikes and received the same final score. |
|
Magazine February 2011 Place 1 out of 9 |
10/10
Product tested: S 1000 RR (customised) [10]
"Plus: Everything. How can you fault it? |
|
Magazine August 2010 6 products tested |
Without final score
Product tested: S 1000 RR (136kW) [10] "Top dog in 2010 and the way the Japanese manufacturers are running scared with few 2011 models, it looks likely to stay that way for some years to come. A marvelous machine. ... Forgetting the incredible electronic spec of the top-of-the-range model, BMW got the fundamentals right first time, creating a bike whose dynamics are uniquely brilliant. ..." |
|
Tests on similar products: Husqvarna Motorcycle TE 449 (38 kW) [12], Harley-Davidson Fat Boy Special [12], Aprilia RSV 1000 R Factory (102 kW) [05], Ducati Multistrada 1200 S ABS (110 kW) [11], Suzuki GSX-R 1000 K1 (118 kW) [01], Aprilia RS 250 (52 kW) [1996], Harley-Davidson XR1200X (Race Replica), Moto Guzzi V7 Racer (36 kW) [12], Suzuki SV 650 S (modified) [2011], Ducati Hypermotard 1100 Evo SP (modified) [11].
Further information can also be found at
oft.gov.uk
.
Send us more suggestions for helpful sites on the topic BMW Motorrad S 1000 RR.
